But I think there is no probability that a law so unreasonable in itself, (unreasonable even after making all allowance for the difference in the value of money,) and so contrary to immemorial custom, could and did obtain any general or speedy acquiescence among a people who cared little for the authority of kings.
He argues that an unreasonable law would not gain acceptance among a populace that disregarded royal authority.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
It would also be making them consent to what they regard as the destruction of their own rights.
All other laws, it is optional with each man to obey, or not, as he may choose.
Juries would refuse to enforce a tax against a man who had never agreed to pay it.
Any restriction upon the exercise of this right is a restriction upon his rightful power of providing for, and accomplishing, his own well-being.