On the record
That the authority of the king was of little weight with the judicial tribunals, must necessarily be inferred from the fact already stated, that his authority over the people was but weak.
Said by
Lysander Spooner
Source
gutenberg.orgThat the authority of the king was of little weight with the judicial tribunals, must necessarily be inferred from the fact already stated, that his authority over the people was but weak.
Spooner infers that the king's authority was weak based on its limited influence over judicial decisions.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
The answer is, that they are as reliable for that purpose as are the majority; they are as much presumed to have associated, and are as likely to have associated, for that object, as are the majority; and they have as much interest in such…
In that case the trial is really a trial by the government, and not by the jury.
And nobody is bound to take the least notice of them, unless it be to trample them under foot, as usurpations.
Yet the codes of the most celebrated kings are very small, and were little more than compilations of immemorial customs.