On the record
There is substantially the same reason why a jury ought to judge of the justice of laws, and hold all unjust laws invalid, in civil suits, as in criminal ones.
Said by
Lysander Spooner
Source
gutenberg.orgLysander Spooner: “There is substantially the same reason why a jury ought to judge of the justice of laws, and hold all unjust laws…”
Editor's note · Context
Spooner posits that juries should evaluate the justice of laws, asserting that unjust laws should be deemed invalid.
Share
More from Lysander Spooner
The people are no more arrayed against themselves, when a jury puts its veto upon a statute, which the other tribunals have sanctioned, than they are when the same veto is exercised by the representatives, the senate, the executive, or the…
Juries would refuse to enforce a tax against a man who had never agreed to pay it.
Yet the codes of the most celebrated kings are very small, and were little more than compilations of immemorial customs.
In that case the trial is really a trial by the government, and not by the jury.