Well, the fundamental difference from the line-item veto is that it does not require a supermajority to reject the idea of the President. It requires a majority of both Houses--both Houses have to have a majority vote in favor of the President's position. Therefore, either House can strike down the President's position. So you retain-- we, the Congress--the power of the purse.
Judd Gregg: “Well, the fundamental difference from the line-item veto is that it does not require a supermajority to reject the idea…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the differences between the line-item veto and congressional authority.
Share
More from Judd Gregg
the issue for nuclear is that, because it does these good things, like reduce carbon and have reliability and be part of the diversity mix, it gets no credit for this in the marketplace.
But there is no question that if you are going to address this issue in a way that has substantive impact on the future of our Nation, the prosperity of our children, and our standard of living, it is the second 10 years, and the third 10…
The Simpson-Bowles Commission...came to the conclusion that on our present path this Nation goes bankrupt.
My experience in these debates, the person who wins is the person who establishes himself with the American people toward the audience, this can be a huge audience, as being one reasonably likable.