Judd Gregg: “I think Simpson-Bowles got it right on this point. We reduced deductions and exemptions so that we generated $1.1…”

In Hillary's case, it's a big issue, because of her -- because of the challenges that she has on the ethical side. In Trump's case, it's a big issue, because he's so erratic.

It makes no sense whatsoever, and it's apparently--certainly makes no sense for the same people to be urgently arguing to deal with climate change and then either quiet or urgently opposed to nuclear power.

There's never been a death at a nuclear power plant as a result of a reactor accident in the United States.

The issue for nuclear is that, because it does these good things, like reduce carbon and have reliability and be part of the diversity mix, it gets no credit for this in the marketplace.