If the Senator's position is he is willing to allow relevant amendments, then we can develop a unanimous consent request which says ``relevant amendments.'' Is that the Senator's position? The Senator just used the world ``relevant'' three times to describe the amendments he would propound. Therefore, it should not be a problem for the Senator to offer relevant amendments.
Discussing the possibility of allowing relevant amendments during Senate debate.
Share
More from Judd Gregg
But there is no question that if you are going to address this issue in a way that has substantive impact on the future of our Nation, the prosperity of our children, and our standard of living, it is the second 10 years, and the third 10…
the issue for nuclear is that, because it does these good things, like reduce carbon and have reliability and be part of the diversity mix, it gets no credit for this in the marketplace.
Our Nation's nuclear power plants are vital national assets that provide reliable, carbon-free electricity.
My experience in these debates, the person who wins is the person who establishes himself with the American people toward the audience, this can be a huge audience, as being one reasonably likable.