I understand the interest of the distinguished senior Senator from New Mexico regarding mental health parity legislation and I would concur with my colleague's assessment. S. Con. Res. 83 does assume the revenue impact of enacting a mental health parity bill.
Share
More from Judd Gregg
That is actually why I was so encouraged by the President putting 'change CPI' on the table.
In Hillary's case, it's a big issue, because of her -- because of the challenges that she has on the ethical side. In Trump's case, it's a big issue, because he's so erratic.
Yes, I do. And it's driven by people being concerned about carbon emissions and global warming, and common sense taking hold.
America is one debt deal away from leading the world out of its economic doldrums.