The Sugar Program in this country has proceeded since the early 1980's to be a program of inordinate subsidy for a few small farmers--for a few farmers; they are not small farmers--at the expense of the consumers of this country. Last year, it was estimated that the Sugar Program cost the consumers of this country approximately $1.4 billion. It has cost the consumers of this country approximately $10 billion over the last decade. That is because we have in this country a system in the Sugar Program where we artificially inflate the cost of sugar to benefit a few growers of sugarcane and some sugar beets, but primarily in this instance it is benefiting sugarcane growers. This makes no sense. This program is appropriately tied to sugar, I guess, because the last vestiges of Marxism in the world of any significance is the nation of Cuba, which always had a sugar-based economy.
Judd Gregg: “The Sugar Program in this country has proceeded since the early 1980's to be a program of inordinate subsidy for a few…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the Sugar Program on consumers during a debate on farm-related legislation.
Share
More from Judd Gregg
I would suggest that on issues that involve all Americans, where pretty much everybody is affected, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and tax reform, that if you push forward in a partisan way, at least 50 percent, maybe a little less…
It makes no sense to close down nuclear reactors if they still have useful life.
I think Simpson-Bowles got it right on this point. We reduced deductions and exemptions so that we generated $1.1 trillion of revenue every year.
But there is no question that if you are going to address this issue in a way that has substantive impact on the future of our Nation, the prosperity of our children, and our standard of living, it is the second 10 years, and the third 10…