Political Quotes

Judd Gregg: Returning to the underlying issue, which is the District of Columbia appropriations bill, and specifically the language…

On the recordSeptember 30, 2003
Returning to the underlying issue, which is the District of Columbia appropriations bill, and specifically the language in that bill which created new dollars at the request of the Mayor and the president of the school board and members of the school council to fund three basic programs, one is school improvement, the second is charter schools, and the third is a choice program which would involve not only public but also private schools within the city. Unfortunately, I was not here for all the debate, but it is important to talk about who is being impacted. Who is this debate really about? The District of Columbia has a very large school system. Unfortunately, it is one that has some very fundamental problems. Those problems have created an atmosphere where, regrettably, a large number of children cannot get a decent education. In fact, this picture highlights it. Statistics show that 47 out of 100 children are being sent to failure by being required to go through the entire public school system in Washington, DC. Essentially, the public school system in Washington spends a huge amount of money, but regrettably it doesn't educate kids very well. Seventy-five percent of the fourth graders in this city are reading below basic reading levels. Only 11 percent of the eighth graders in this city are proficient in math.
Said by
Judd Gregg

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the District of Columbia appropriations bill and its impact on education.

Share

More from Judd Gregg

Sep 7, 2016

The classic example of this is ObamaCare. It was pushed through on a partisan vote.

congress.gov
Sep 7, 2016

Had it been actually a legislative vehicle versus a commission, we probably would be out of the woods right now on our deficit and debt issues.

congress.gov
Mar 13, 2013

I think Dr. Rivlin is absolutely correct on both points, and Simpson-Bowles did the same thing that Domenici-Rivlin did, which was to actually increase benefits to single women over 85, and low-income individuals.

congress.gov
Mar 13, 2013

But there is no question that if you are going to address this issue in a way that has substantive impact on the future of our Nation, the prosperity of our children, and our standard of living, it is the second 10 years, and the third 10…

congress.gov