in light of the position of the Senator from Arkansas, I am especially appreciative of his courtesy. The proposal is outlined on this yellow sheet. Somebody from one of the sugar-producing States accused me of yellow journalism, but I hope the Members of the Senate will take time to review the sheet. It essentially says the sugar program and producers will be put on the same level as students, veterans and homeowners who, when they default on a loan to the Federal Government, are personally responsible to pay it. Under the program, as currently structured, that is not the case. I could have offered an amendment which would deal with the essence of the sugar program in the pricing policy, which is this outrageous ripoff of the American consumer to the extent of $1.4 billion. But rather than do that, I have limited this to the issue of liability in the area of a sugar processor who fails to repay their loan. And it only applies to sugar processors with more than $15 million of annual sales. Therefore, I think it is a very reasonable amendment. And I would appreciate the consideration by the body.
Judd Gregg: “in light of the position of the Senator from Arkansas, I am especially appreciative of his courtesy. The proposal is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the sugar program and loan repayment responsibilities.
Share
More from Judd Gregg
Why would we do it? Because it makes no sense, from the standpoint of policy.
A lot of that economic growth was driven by a bubble, and I don't really think we want to revisit that.
I think in order to get Republican buy-in on further revenues you are going to have to do policy changes in entitlement accounts that bend the curves in the outyear in a very substantial way, and make it clear that those accounts are…
But there is no question that if you are going to address this issue in a way that has substantive impact on the future of our Nation, the prosperity of our children, and our standard of living, it is the second 10 years, and the third 10…