Political Quotes

Judd Gregg: If you look at this proposal which has come forward, offered by the Senator from Michigan, essentially its outcome will…

On the recordJuly 18, 2002
If you look at this proposal which has come forward, offered by the Senator from Michigan, essentially its outcome will be that the discounts allowed under Medicaid, which States get for their Medicaid recipients, which are significant discounts--nobody should underestimate, these are big discounts which drug companies that make your product are required to give to the States through the Medicaid process--those discounts under the proposal of the Senator from Michigan, those discounts will now be transferable to a whole new population of people, a very large, potentially very large population of people. As the Senator from Oklahoma pointed out rather correctly, that population is not necessarily going to be means tested, not necessarily going to be of need. It could simply be a population which qualifies for this new discount under a State plan. As a result, what you are going to do is end up for those drugs significantly reducing the revenues which flow to whoever produced that drug.
Said by
Judd Gregg

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of a Medicaid discount proposal during Senate debate.

Share

More from Judd Gregg

Mar 13, 2013

I think Simpson-Bowles got it right on this point. We reduced deductions and exemptions so that we generated $1.1 trillion of revenue every year.

congress.gov
Sep 13, 2016

Meeting state and national carbon reduction goals will be compromised without existing nuclear power plants.

congress.gov
Mar 13, 2013

I think in order to get Republican buy-in on further revenues you are going to have to do policy changes in entitlement accounts that bend the curves in the outyear in a very substantial way, and make it clear that those accounts are…

congress.gov
Mar 13, 2013

I think Dr. Rivlin is absolutely correct on both points, and Simpson-Bowles did the same thing that Domenici-Rivlin did, which was to actually increase benefits to single women over 85, and low-income individuals.

congress.gov