First of all, physicians I have spoken to do not think the bill the Senator is talking about adequately covers them. That is why they still have to carry medical malpractice insurance, similar to what Senator Frist has to carry. My amendment would help lower the cost of this type of coverage, so we think this bill is necessary. I don't understand--if this is already covered in law, why would it be a problem to include it to make sure we are saying to the courts that we absolutely want to cover people who are providing pro bono services to the needy.
John Ensign: “First of all, physicians I have spoken to do not think the bill the Senator is talking about adequately covers them.…”
On the recordJune 28, 2001
Said by
John Ensign
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the inadequacies of a bill related to medical malpractice insurance for physicians.
Share
More from John Ensign
Dec 21, 2010
let me just read one paragraph from this: If Russia chose to develop and deploy rail-mobile ICBMs, such missiles and their launchers would be subject to the Treaty and its limitations. That is according to our State Department. Specific…
May 2, 2011
I rise today to deliver a very difficult speech. This will be my farewell speech to the Senate. Serving as Nevada's 24th Senator has truly been the greatest professional privilege of my life. Growing up with a single mom in very humble…
Jan 6, 2011
We have to make such difficult--these are going to be painful--politically painful choices to make.