That is the intent. There may be something other than constant monitoring that can lead them to the same conclusion. Right now, constant monitoring would be the type of technology that would assure the safety of that pipeline. There may be something tomorrow that will be just as good as constant monitoring. I do not know that would be there. It would be a technology that would ensure the integrity and safety of that pipeline. That will be equally as good or better than an inspection.
John B. Breaux: “That is the intent. There may be something other than constant monitoring that can lead them to the same conclusion.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing pipeline safety technology and monitoring methods.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
The fundraising and the traveling, things she's done for the party, I mean, she's a real rock star on the fundraising circuit.
Let me suggest it is a program that is more popular today than the Congress that wrote it.
Suppose you have somebody who may not do that. Is there any provision in the bill that says what will happen to the company that does not abide by the plan? I believe in trust but verify. If you don't do what you say you are going to do…
My opinion is that in order to ever reach an agreement between the two parties, Congress is going to have to combine the best of what government can do with the best of what the private sector can do and put the two together.