That is the intent. There may be something other than constant monitoring that can lead them to the same conclusion. Right now, constant monitoring would be the type of technology that would assure the safety of that pipeline. There may be something tomorrow that will be just as good as constant monitoring. I do not know that would be there. It would be a technology that would ensure the integrity and safety of that pipeline. That will be equally as good or better than an inspection.
John B. Breaux: “That is the intent. There may be something other than constant monitoring that can lead them to the same conclusion.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing pipeline safety technology and monitoring methods.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
I start off by commending the authors of the amendment for a real serious effort to try to improve the bill. But I rise in opposition because there is not any segment of the senior population that you could not isolate and target and say…
the oral health of older Americans is in a state of decay. Millions of vulnerable seniors are unable to access the oral health care they need, suffer needlessly, and ultimately require costly and invasive treatments that unnecessarily…
Senator Landrieu and I rise today to add our voices to those who have been calling for a comprehensive national solution to the asbestos litigation problem. Several members of both parties have recently come to the floor to discuss this…
The great challenge today I would just suggest to both my Democratic colleagues and my Republican friends and colleagues... is how do both political parties bridge the gap between the different political philosophies and produce health…