I wonder if anybody in this body remembers Enron. Let's trust that they are going to do right. They are a U.S. corporation that created more tax shelters than the IRS could count. It took a group of Philadelphia lawyers 2 months to even add up the number of tax shelters they had around the world. They had so many the IRS couldn't even follow it. If you are going to give people who have tax shelters and a stash in income in foreign tax havens a huge benefit to bring the money back into this country, we ought to make sure they are going to use it for job creation. Without my amendment, they have to file a plan that says this is what they are going to spend it on. Suppose they don't spend one nickel more than they did last year on job creation. Suppose they don't spend one nickel more on capital expenditures than they did last year. Suppose they don't spend one more nickel on pensions for the workers than they did last year, but they comply with what they said they were going to do in their little plan. They are fine. They don't have to spend one nickel more under the committee bill, with all this money they are going to bring back at a 5-percent tax rate, in terms of creating jobs than they did before. The Breaux-Feinstein amendment says: If you want to bring it back for that purpose, you have to show us that is what you are using it for.
John B. Breaux: “I wonder if anybody in this body remembers Enron. Let's trust that they are going to do right. They are a U.S.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for accountability in tax repatriation related to job creation.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
if we are going to look in the MARAD program for huge amounts of waste, fraud, and abuse compared to everything else, I would suggest that we're going to be spending a lot of time, with little results.
I will just make a couple of comments in opposition to the resolution because I think the resolution is sort of a broad-brush approach that takes down everything the FCC has recommended, things that make sense that are good and also things…
the amount that we have in so many of our programs is just incredible in comparison to this one.
Let me suggest it is a program that is more popular today than the Congress that wrote it.