I don't want to belabor this any longer. But I say to the ranking member, there is only one case out of the 30 years where the President's authority was ever challenged to do what he did in moving employees around. And in that case, which was a case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, on the question of whether the President had proved the reason for making the decision that he made, the court said--I will have it printed in the Record-- The executive order under review cited accurately the statutory source of authority therefor, and purported to amend an earlier order that indubitably was . . . proper. . . .The act does not itself require or even suggest that any finding be reproduced in the order. I would say, in layman's language, that basically said: Look, once the President says I am doing this because the mission and responsibilities have materially changed, he does not have to make a finding.
John B. Breaux: “I don't want to belabor this any longer. But I say to the ranking member, there is only one case out of the 30 years…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing presidential authority regarding employee movement during a floor speech.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
I start off by commending the authors of the amendment for a real serious effort to try to improve the bill. But I rise in opposition because there is not any segment of the senior population that you could not isolate and target and say…
Just like my Chevy II, things have changed, things have improved, so our recommendation is that we keep Medicare of course.
today we are honored by the nomination of Debbie Hersman to serve as a member of the National Transportation Safety Board. Along with Senator Hollings, I have spent a great deal of time over the last 5 years working with Debbie. She has…
if we are going to look in the MARAD program for huge amounts of waste, fraud, and abuse compared to everything else, I would suggest that we're going to be spending a lot of time, with little results.