Political Quotes

James M. Jeffords: I offered this amendment on behalf of myself, Senator Simpson, Senator Snowe and, I believe, Senator Chafee. I have not…

On the recordSeptember 14, 1995
I offered this amendment on behalf of myself, Senator Simpson, Senator Snowe and, I believe, Senator Chafee. I have not had time to gather others who, I am sure, want to cosponsor it. This is an important amendment. I hope that my colleagues will listen carefully to what this does. It is an amendment with all the good intentions in the world and something that we all believe in--that we should reduce the out-of-wedlock births. It hopes to do this by giving an incentive to States to do things to try and reduce it and be rewarded if they are successful. What it does is says we shall carefully--keep track of what I say--set as a baseline the year 1995, and we will draw the baseline for each State on the number of abortions which were performed in that State and also the number of out-of- wedlock births that occur during that period of time. That might be well, but I would have to point out that such statistics do not exist in any valid form. So we will be establishing a baseline, first of all, that really we do not have any idea whether it is valid or not. Then it says that if you reduce your out-of-wedlock births by 1 percent and you do not increase your abortions, then you will be rewarded with a 5-percent increase in the amount of money you receive across the board for welfare. If you do it by 2 percent, you will get a 10 percent. That may sound good, too, but remember, to start with we do not have any baseline that we have any accuracy with.…
Said by
James M. Jeffords

Editor's note · Context

Discussing an amendment aimed at reducing out-of-wedlock births and its implications during Senate debate.

Share

More from James M. Jeffords

Dec 14, 2005

the people of Vermont are proud of the important role that Senator Patrick Leahy is serving in trying to improve the USA PATRIOT Act. My colleague from Vermont rightly believes that security and civil liberties need not be mutually…

govinfo.gov
Sep 6, 2006

These innovations have the potential to move us into an era when driving a car or truck will no longer mean causing dangerous global warming pollution or using up scarce resources.

congress.gov
Jan 26, 2006

there is no higher legal authority in the United States than the U.S. Supreme Court. It is the final arbiter on the meaning of laws and the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court gives meaning to the scope of the right of privacy; whether…

govinfo.gov
Sep 27, 2006

Even a diehard Red Sox fan has to give the devil his due. Probably the most moving moment in the history of baseball was when longtime New York Yankees first baseman Lou Gehrig walked on the field to accept the tribute of his fans and…

govinfo.gov