Tomorrow I will introduce my amendment on child care. Today, there are more than 12 million children under the age of five--including half of all infants under one year of age--who spend at least part of their day being cared for by someone other than their parents. The past two decades have seen a dramatic rise in the number of women in the paid labor force. More than 60 percent of women with preschool aged children, are employed full- or part-time. For most of these families, child care is a requirement, not an option. Women now constitute 46 percent of our Nation's labor force. Most women are not working just to achieve a degree of personal growth outside the home, but to meet their family's basic needs. Their employment is not a choice, but an essential part of their family's economic survival. Similarly, child care that is affordable and convenient is necessary for most women working outside the home. Many of the traditional sources of child care are no longer available--as many of the friends, neighbors, grandparents, and other relatives who used to be available to provide child care are also working. Research has repeatedly demonstrated that for parents who must work, child care services that are dependable and of high quality make it easier to find and keep a job. Good child care helps parents reach and maintain economic self-sufficiency. There is a clear connection between child care and the production of income.
James M. Jeffords: “Tomorrow I will introduce my amendment on child care. Today, there are more than 12 million children under the age of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for affordable child care amid rising employment of women.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
while we are nearing completion of this bill, I would like to take a few minutes to highlight some of the projects in the bill for my State of Vermont. Throughout our work on this bill, I have worked to find a way to use the Army Corps of…
generally when we vote, the decisions we make can be revisited within a few months or years. This year's appropriations policy can be replaced by a new one next year. Unintended consequences can be rectified, legislation fine tuned. But…
I regard the RFS as the first step, and one that only produces a transition fuel on our way to a more climate-friendly future.
What we need is a future based upon the abundant supply of domestically produced clean and low-carbon fuel.