the Daschle-Bingaman substitute amendment, also known as the Energy Policy Act of 2002, includes portions of a bill that was reported favorably last year from the Committee on Environment and Public Works. That bill, the Federal Reformulated Fuels Act, S. 950, was approved with the committee's understanding that further action by the full Senate would be necessary to solve the delicate problem of eliminating MTBE from the fuel supply to protect water resources, while maintaining air quality and stimulating renewable fuel use. The substitute amendment before the Senate now does a good job of resolving that problem and balancing many political and environmental concerns. This language does not represent the perfect solution for my State or the Northeast. However, without it, MTBE contamination of water resources will continue unabated. With it, at least we can be assured of greater protection of air and water quality. If States proceed to ban MTBE without clear Federal authority provided in this amendment, air quality could suffer as RFG areas would be forced to use ethanol in a very inflexible way due to the existing oxygen content requirement in the Clean Air Act.
James M. Jeffords: “the Daschle-Bingaman substitute amendment, also known as the Energy Policy Act of 2002, includes portions of a bill that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Energy Policy Act of 2002 and its implications for MTBE and environmental protection.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
generally when we vote, the decisions we make can be revisited within a few months or years. This year's appropriations policy can be replaced by a new one next year. Unintended consequences can be rectified, legislation fine tuned. But…
the proposed budget, while far more realistic than previous years, falls short of our commitment to America's veterans. The amendment would provide an additional $1.5 billion for VA health care in fiscal year 2007, improving funding for…
there is no higher legal authority in the United States than the U.S. Supreme Court. It is the final arbiter on the meaning of laws and the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court gives meaning to the scope of the right of privacy; whether…
last Thursday I submitted a statement expressing my concerns with the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the United States Supreme Court. I am here today to reiterate these concerns as we move toward a final vote on this nomination. There…