The Supreme Court has made it very clear that statistical sampling is not permissible for apportionment purposes. That is the law. We will enforce the law. That is the position, plain and simple.
Gary Locke: “The Supreme Court has made it very clear that statistical sampling is not permissible for apportionment purposes. That…”
Editor's note · Context
Locke asserts the legality of using actual counts over statistical sampling for the census.
Share
More from Gary Locke
Senator Begich raised the issues of Alaska. I mean it is ground zero. It will require assistance, help, in terms of relocation, infrastructure investments, emergency response efforts to flooding and storms that will be coming about, and…
we cannot be successful in having sustainable harvests, having sustainable fisheries if we do not have the science and the scientific data to drive those policy decisions.
American companies are losing hundreds of millions of dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars every year in lost revenues, and that is tantamount to theft.
Generations of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders who choose to enter politics have him to thank for blazing the trail for all of us.