However, I support this measure because the threats from a limited missile attack are here, now, very real, and potentially very disastrous for our citizens, who are right now undefended against this threat. Contrary to what over 70 percent of the American people believe, we and our forces abroad do not have defense capabilities against even a single ballistic missile. Let me say it again, this U.S. does not have defense capabilities against a single ballistic missile. Is an NMD technologically possible? Yes, it clearly will be technologically feasible. Just 3 days ago, in the skies over New Mexico, the U.S. Army successfully, in effect, hit a bullet with a bullet.
Doug Bereuter: “However, I support this measure because the threats from a limited missile attack are here, now, very real, and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing missile defense capabilities and supporting a resolution on national security.
Share
More from Doug Bereuter
it is unfortunate, but H.R. 1308 is a new $82 billion tax cut package that simply is too large. The House-passed version of H.R. 1308 will add to the already unprecedented national debt that future generations will face. Apparently, the…
as the chairman of the House delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly and currently the president of the assembly, I have frequently had to reassure parliamentarians that the outrageous and false allegations they had heard about the…
this Member, as a cosponsor of the resolution and a committed friend of the Turkish people, rises in strong support of H. Res. 453. This Member would like to thank the distinguished gentleman from Florida (Mr. Hastings) for introducing…
this Member has been a strong supporter of regulatory burden relief for our financial institutions in the past. However, this Member will oppose the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2003 (H.R. 1375) because of the provisions…