In order to make that happen and to encourage that kind of economic growth, the kind that we have experienced over the last 6 years, we have to make sure we do the right things that help foster economic growth. I want to ask the gentleman, just in terms of speculation and knowing the nature of the city, when there are extra dollars laying around, whether they are real or perceived extra dollars, can the gentleman define for the House what the gentleman thinks the debate will be over the next few months or years around this $1 trillion surplus that the President tripped over yesterday and accidentally discovered? What does the gentleman think will happen next on the House floor? Does the gentleman think we will have the courage to give that money back to the taxpayers?
Bob Schaffer: “In order to make that happen and to encourage that kind of economic growth, the kind that we have experienced over the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a $1 trillion surplus and its potential impact on taxpayers.
Share
More from Bob Schaffer
that really is the whole point and why it is so important here because the Treasury Department people, their focus is the Tax Code. That is their job. That is their mission in life. That is what they do for a living, and when we go meet…
Because without the bill, as the law stands today, let us just assume Americans who pay taxes, they will be forced to just pay that $250 to the Federal Government. That is where that money will go without our bill. What we are saying is…
I do not care how late it is, and I do not care how many times we have to hear it, but this is something that we need to speak about more often. Let me be a little critical of our own party, if I can. We are Republicans, we are…
This is a bill that is about rich versus poor. And it is surprising to me to hear the opponents of the rule and the bill speak so viciously against the poor in America because that is what they are doing. See, if one is wealthy in America…