As a parent of five children who rely on public education for hope and opportunity, that kind of political gamesmanship breaks my heart, Mr. Speaker. I hope that the children of America and those kids who are in school who count on us to focus in a serious way on education can see this silly amendment defeated for its purposes, for its intent, and for the fallacies that it contains. And there are several. It is a very confining amendment that restricts school board members and States as to how they can spend Federal education dollars. So if they are in the business, Mr. Speaker, of constraining and restricting and narrowing the scope for these Federal dollars, then this is an amendment for them. But for the rest of us who hope that these dollars can be spent on the priorities that exist in schools across the country, this would be an amendment to oppose.
Bob Schaffer: “As a parent of five children who rely on public education for hope and opportunity, that kind of political gamesmanship…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to federal education funding.
Share
More from Bob Schaffer
I really enjoyed the chance to discuss and act on issues similar to the ones you're considering today.
as author of this bill, I rise today to urge my colleagues to support H.R. 5308, a bill designating the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 301 South Howes Street in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the ``Barney Apodaca Post…
that really is the whole point and why it is so important here because the Treasury Department people, their focus is the Tax Code. That is their job. That is their mission in life. That is what they do for a living, and when we go meet…
The current education funding formula at the Federal level is a very rigid, bureaucratic structure.