The Senator's memory is correct. We were told if we voted against any nominee who happens to be either a woman or a minority, we were, indeed, guilty. Now we have one who happens to be a minority. I do not believe nominations should be made on the basis of gender or minority status. But when we have a nominee based on quality, who happens to be in a minority status, I find it disingenuous of those who made the point of the minority status. We didn't; they did. Those who made the point of the minority status now are insisting that the minority status should not be considered. I wish they would be consistent. Either minority status does not matter or it does, and if it does, as they insist, it should be a reason for them to vote for this nominee.
Bill Bennett: “The Senator's memory is correct. We were told if we voted against any nominee who happens to be either a woman or a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of minority status in judicial nominations.
Share
More from Bill Bennett
I don't think it's a good idea for the speaker of the House to call the CIA people liars.
If they get it through, you know, what took so long? And the miracle will be they've done this in the teeth of the American people who are opposed to this thing.
It turns out, at least so far, that stimulus doesn't seem to be helping. Now we are asked to spend even more money, and not look at the details of this health care plan. Hurry up. Hurry up. Push it through. Don't look at the man behind the…
I, along with the senior senator from Utah, am introducing today legislation to authorize the Secretary of Transportation to release restrictions on the use of certain property conveyed to the city of St. George, Utah for airport purposes…