Political Quotes

Bart Stupak: I reluctantly vote for this bill for the sole reason of moving the foreign affairs platform forward. I believe H.R. 4811…

On the recordJuly 13, 2000
I reluctantly vote for this bill for the sole reason of moving the foreign affairs platform forward. I believe H.R. 4811 is a bad bill for various reasons. It appropriates a total of $13.3 billion for fiscal year 2001--$1.9 billion or 12% below the Administration's request and $451 million less than the fiscal year 2000 funding level. This bill makes large cuts in funding for programs which most directly affect the poorest countries in the world--cuts that disproportionately affect African and Latin American countries--and contains only $82 million of the $472 million request for multilateral debt relief assistance. Further, the bill drastically cuts international financial institution funding that provides interest-free loans to poor countries. H.R. 4811 cuts $42 million from international HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, a cut I find deplorable. Although this bill is badly flawed in many ways, I believe the best way to address those problems is to move it forward and express my concerns directly to the conferees. If the bill is reported out of conference with my concerns left unaddressed, I will support the President's veto.
Said by
Bart Stupak

Editor's note · Context

Addressing concerns about the Foreign Operations Appropriations bill, H.R. 4811, during House floor debate.

Share

More from Bart Stupak

Dec 21, 2010

As I wrap up my 18 years in the U.S. House of Representatives, this is a good bill in which to wrap up a career. I first introduced food safety legislation along with Mr. Dingell and Mr. Pallone and now-Senator Brownback in 1997. For 14…

govinfo.gov
Mar 21, 2010

I wish the Republican leadership would talk to their members and tell them there's a proper decorum and let's be respectful. We set examples.

transcripts.cnn.com
Jul 1, 2010

Yes, it did. We were shocked that he would even bring it up in the first meeting, and then in the second meeting we had with them.

transcripts.cnn.com
Jun 25, 2008

Because they began the negotiation under IGRA, as required under section 20, to begin a negotiation with the Governor, and they had to make a settlement with the Governor, who can do it. So, instead of going back to court, they used the…

govinfo.gov