I think it is up to the judge to say what the Constitution provided, even if what it provided is not the best answer, even if you think it should be amended. If that is what it says, that is what it says.
Antonin Scalia: “I think it is up to the judge to say what the Constitution provided, even if what it provided is not the best answer…”
Editor's note · Context
Justice Scalia emphasizes the judge's duty to interpret the Constitution as it is written.
Share
More from Antonin Scalia
There is no justification for this Court to read exemptions into the act beyond those provided by Congress. If the act is to be altered, then it is a function for the same body that adopted it.
The Constitution’s Bill of Rights is designed to guard against a spirit of oppression and tyranny on the part of rulers.
We should say here that the President's constitutionally assigned duties include complete control over investigation and prosecution of violation of law, and that the inexorable command of Article II is clear and definite. The executive…
For my part, I do not look forward to a society which, thanks to the Supreme Court campaigns anonymously hidden from public scrutiny and protected from the accountability of criticism. This does not resemble the home of the brave.