I think to be clear, a decision to implement mandatory labeling would then not be based on safety concerns or sound science, but on other factors?
Steve Daines: “I think to be clear, a decision to implement mandatory labeling would then not be based on safety concerns or sound…”
On the recordMarch 1, 2016
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Senator Daines questions the basis for mandatory labeling decisions.
Share
More from Steve Daines
Jun 8, 2025
What the president made clear is [he] does not want to see any cuts to beneficiaries. But to go after, he repeated over again, the waste, fraud and abuse, the waste, fraud and abuse.
May 21, 2024
The tribes shouldn't have to take the BIA to court to squeeze out more resources to serve their communities.
Mar 17, 2026
Let me be clear. The bill before us today requires proof of citizenship when registering to vote, and it requires photo ID in order to vote in a Federal election. If you want to fish in Montana, if you want to fly fish, if you want to get…
Jun 11, 2024
I will say I am disappointed that my Crow Revenue Act was not included in today's hearing.





