I first want to join with the chairman to state that I do support the amendment and compliment the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Watt) for bringing it forward. This bill is going to create new financial institutions, allow them to provide new services which will hopefully lower the cost to consumers and create greater competition, and in the end the consumers are going to benefit that. But there is a serious concern, and that has to do with lending institutions who have the ability to exert undue influence, some would say even potentially coercive influence over their customers. H.R. 10, this bill, substantially erodes the States' supervision over insurance sales. In fact, it defers to the Comptroller of the Currency with regard to the sale of insurance by national banks. And there is great concern on my part and others about this bill for that reason, and it is my hope that we will go beyond this amendment in conference to deal with this. But it is extremely important, I think, that the House tonight assert the concept that lenders cannot exert this influence, tying sales of other services in order to influence a loan. Today in every State in the union that conduct is assured through the actions of insurance commissioners and state legislators. Unfortunately this law, H.R. 10 if it passes, will preempt that making that authority void.
Rick Hill: “I first want to join with the chairman to state that I do support the amendment and compliment the gentleman from North…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about H.R. 10 and its impact on state supervision of insurance sales.
Share
More from Rick Hill
the Forest Service roads moratorium now in effect, defies the good common sense required to maintain our Nation's force. In essence, the administration is saying that we are going to take a time-out in managing our forests. In the…
If someone loaded a gun and handed it to somebody and then pointed that person at a target, the person providing the gun could not plead innocent when the other individual pulled the trigger. But that is what the authors of this bill are…
Mr. Chairman, I want to carry on the debate and discussion about the issue of sugar. I made note when the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Miller) was on the floor. He said when the agreement was reached in 1996, taxpayers were promised that…
last fall the President said we should set aside 100 percent of social security for social security. I voted to support him in that. But in January he stood here at the State of the Union and said, no, we are going to put aside 62 percent…





