Political Quotes

Max Baucus: I support the motion to take up H.R. 10 so we can consider the retirement bill as an amendment. Let me explain why this…

On the recordNovember 28, 2001
I support the motion to take up H.R. 10 so we can consider the retirement bill as an amendment. Let me explain why this bill is necessary and then I will respond to some of the criticisms that were made yesterday. By way of background, the Federal railroad retirement system has served railroaders and their families for 65 years. Its roots reach back to the 1930s, in a struggle to find answers to the hardships that resulted from the Great Depression. Today, the system provides benefit payments to more than 673,000 retirees and other beneficiaries. The railroad retirement system actually has two components. Tier 1 is largely equivalent to Social Security. Tier 2 provides additional benefits and is equivalent to a private pension plan. Both are funded by taxes that are paid entirely by railroad companies and railroad workers. Let me stop here and stress a critical point. Every single change that we make in this bill applies only to tier 2. Again, tier 2 is equivalent to a private pension program. In other words, we are only addressing how railroad retirement operates as a private pension plan. We are not making any changes to the part of the program that is largely equivalent to Social Security. So where do things stand? At one point, the Railroad Retirement system was in deep trouble. Just like the Social Security system. In fact, in 1983, we had to permanently cut benefits and increase taxes, in order to get the system back on its financial feet.
Said by
Max Baucus
Democratic · Montana

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the necessity of H.R. 10 related to the railroad retirement system.

Share

More from Max Baucus

Mar 28, 2017

I did not ever hear anybody in China advocate the Americans should stick with agreements that you have to transfer technology.

congress.gov
Mar 28, 2017

So from my perspective, all I heard is China complaining, frankly, that the U.S. is not allowing the technology transfer that they like under the U.S. Export and Control Act.

congress.gov
Aug 7, 2017

I'm saying China would not stand idly by. They would not just sit there and watch whatever may or may not unfold in North Korea should U.S. attempt preemptive strike.

transcripts.cnn.com
Mar 28, 2017

In fact, the opposite was just the case. They kept complaining to us about our restrictions of technology transfer to China.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation