Under current law, safe drinking water funding in fiscal years 1994 through 2000 will be $420 million. That money is going to the States. Under this bill, if it passes, $7.3 billion will go to States to fund the reformed mandates that the bill provides. The basic intent of the Senator's amendment is to address the very large issue of unfunded mandates. Again, I say to the Senator and to anyone listening that this bill addresses unfunded mandates; No. 1, by reforming the mandates; No. 2, by funding the reform mandates, and, No. 3, by providing flexibility to the States so they can adjust to local conditions quite easily. Again, just to repeat, from 1994 through the year 2000, under current law, States will receive about $420 million to pay for requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act. If this bill passes, that increases at least fourteenfold to $7.3 billion over the same number of years. It is a whole new start. The State revolving loan fund is all new. It will go a long way to address these issues.
Max Baucus: “Under current law, safe drinking water funding in fiscal years 1994 through 2000 will be $420 million. That money is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for safe drinking water and addressing unfunded mandates in proposed legislation.
Share
More from Max Baucus
During my several years of experience as representative of United States -- to China -- one, the Chinese are very respective of strength. And they probably respect -- when President Trump vacillates and issues contradictory statements and…
This is not a fixable Washington problem. This is a condition, like a chronic condition, that we are going to have to cope with.
So from my perspective, all I heard is China complaining, frankly, that the U.S. is not allowing the technology transfer that they like under the U.S. Export and Control Act.
I think we should press protection of human rights, but we are only going to get so far.





