Max Baucus: “I rise to object to the Blunt amendment. I believe this amendment is extreme and it would undermine the delicate balance…”

“I rise to object to the Blunt amendment. I believe this amendment is extreme and it would undermine the delicate balance between religious freedom and a woman's health. It would be a mistake. It goes too far. It would allow any employer to prevent a woman's access to mammograms, prenatal care, even vaccinations or any other form of preventive care. In Montana, my State, 62,000 women could lose access to preventive care. I am here to say that is wrong, and I am going to go to bat for them. I think a woman should decide for herself and her family what preventive care makes the most sense for her. As Americans, we believe in individual liberties and equal access to health care. Current policy upholds those values. It preserves the integrity of a woman's freedom and the right to access all health care services. It protects the religious liberties that so many Americans, including myself, value. And that is why both faith-based and health communities support this policy--not the Blunt amendment but the current policy. The Blunt amendment would overturn this. It would allow any corporation or health plan to deny women and their families access to preventive health care for almost any reason. It is written so broadly that an employer or an insurance company could deny access to preventive care for virtually any reason. That is not right. I urge my colleagues to vote against the Blunt amendment. I urge them to protect the health of all Americans.…”