No, that would be a significant increase in risk and would not be permitted by this amendment. Increases in cancer risk of a lesser amount would be authorized. No matter what the feasible level is, an increase in cancer risk of the same degree as an increase from 1 to a million to 1 in 100,000 would be significant and prohibited, but lesser increases would be permissible under this amendment.
Discussing cancer risk regulations during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Max Baucus
The Founding Fathers wrote into the Constitution a really crucial role for the Senate.
I'd be hard-pressed to think of anyone more qualified than Danny Werfel to lead the IRS during this critical time of rebuilding.
I loved this job representing the United States in China. It is the best job I ever had.
I am very concerned that this will have an adverse effect on small businesses...
Other voices in this conversation
