this amendment sunsets offsets not in this decade but in the next decade. Many of the provisions in this bill should be permanent; that is, corporate inversion legislation, shelters, provisions that should change the law. That is good public policy. Not all of the provisions in this bill are offsets just to make the budget numbers work. Rather, they are provisions which make good public policy and should continue. Also, it violates the Byrd rule because it raises an extraneous matter in a reconciliation bill. I make a point of order that the amendment violates section 313 of the Budget Act.
Max Baucus: “this amendment sunsets offsets not in this decade but in the next decade. Many of the provisions in this bill should be…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to budget offsets and public policy.
Share
More from Max Baucus
During my several years of experience as representative of United States -- to China -- one, the Chinese are very respective of strength. And they probably respect -- when President Trump vacillates and issues contradictory statements and…
So from my perspective, all I heard is China complaining, frankly, that the U.S. is not allowing the technology transfer that they like under the U.S. Export and Control Act.
I think it's very unwise. Get ratchet up the rhetoric to a point we're getting too close to the tripping point where something disastrous might happen.
Danny has become known as the expert that people turn to for help in navigating the many challenges we face in government.





