if a Senator raised that point of order against the provisions just cited, and the Presiding Officer sustained the point of order, is it not true that the offending provisions would be deemed stricken from the conference report and the Senate would then have before it an amendment between the Houses consisting of the rest of the conference report not so stricken? The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator is correct.
Share
More from Max Baucus
I think it's very unwise. Get ratchet up the rhetoric to a point we're getting too close to the tripping point where something disastrous might happen.
I'd be hard-pressed to think of anyone more qualified than Danny Werfel to lead the IRS during this critical time of rebuilding.
So from my perspective, all I heard is China complaining, frankly, that the U.S. is not allowing the technology transfer that they like under the U.S. Export and Control Act.
Other voices in this conversation
