I am calling it earmarking. America calls it pork. This bill, Mr. Chairman, has in it for the first time an established way for the Congress to simply authorize renovation and construction of new facilities, and do it in a way that we do not earmark them, that we no longer will do that. We cannot have it both ways. We cannot be against pork and then be against a process which the gentleman from California has put in this bill, and the gentleman from Florida would take out, a process which just establishes an institutional way to get on with the business of upgrading existing education facilities and building new ones. If we want to continue to force Members to come to the floor and earmark projects, which is the wrong way to do it, then vote yes on the gentleman's amendment.
John Williams: “I am calling it earmarking. America calls it pork. This bill, Mr. Chairman, has in it for the first time an established…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the issue of earmarking in appropriation bills during a House debate.
Share
More from John Williams
this amendment would conform the Montana water rights language in the bill to the language that this body passed in the Colorado wilderness bill. The amendment changes neither the meaning nor the intent of the water rights section at all…
We need to be able to have the ability to protect ourselves, our families, and our private property, including our livestock, from wolves.
the 15th ward in Syracuse was particularly harmed, and the minority community there, a historically Black community there was actually cut in half.
I came up with the idea for this study because industry and timber industry workers in Montana asked me to find a way to determine the carrying capacity of the land in order to be certain that Montana's natural resources extractive…





