yesterday, I introduced the Private Property Protection Act, a companion bill to legislation in the Senate designed to correct the erroneous decision made by the Supreme Court on June 23. That decision redefined the Constitution's fifth amendment. That decision, Kelo v. City of New London, was a slap in the face of homeowners, small businesses, and, frankly, Americans. Ordinary private property owners stand to suffer from the corrupting influence this sweeping legislation will have because government officials, because government officials can aggressively use the powers of eminent domain purely for economic reasons. Our legislation establishes two important standards that must be met before government decides to exercise its power and take and transfer private property. The first standard is that eminent domain should only be used for public use, as guaranteed by the fifth amendment. The second is that this power should be reserved only for true public uses, not simply to provide private economic development so government can make more tax revenue. Let us stop the abuse of eminent domain before it happens. I urge the Members of this body to support this very necessary piece of legislation. ____________________
Denny Rehberg: “yesterday, I introduced the Private Property Protection Act, a companion bill to legislation in the Senate designed to…”
Share
More from Denny Rehberg
Second, if Congress moves forward with authorization of the Pipeline Infrastructure and Community Protection Act of 2011, I want to be absolutely certain that we are doing everything that we can to prevent future environmental, health…
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Madam Speaker, there is no phrase that better embodies the fact that something here in Washington is broken than ``government shutdown.'' Yesterday we heard those words for the second time in a year, and that tells…
I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…
First, we need to share our knowledge in regards to the ExxonMobil spill so that we can determine what can be done to prevent it from happening again.





