Another question, Mr. Speaker, if I might of the gentleman from Virginia. Is there any reason why this has not happened in the past based upon the majorities of the Congress and the fact that within the last year and a half this is the first time in 40 years we have had an opportunity to effect change? Would we not now try a different management approach? Not to say we are entirely blameless, because certainly we supported Smokey Bear, we believed that putting fires out, we believed that the management plan that existed in the past perhaps had some credibility. But recognizing that it has failed, would it not be incumbent upon us now in our new majority position to come up with a new and more exciting, more vibrant opportunity to see not only a healthier wildlife and a healthier environment but certainly a safer environment for our forests?
Denny Rehberg: “Another question, Mr. Speaker, if I might of the gentleman from Virginia. Is there any reason why this has not happened…”
On the recordNovember 6, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a new management approach for wildlife and forest safety.
Share
More from Denny Rehberg
Feb 1, 2012
I will have a rider on my appropriations bill that I write for the House of Representatives that will keep you from implementing this rule.
Jul 13, 2011
This amendment directs $2.2 million of the Department of Energy's Fossil Energy Research Development budget to the Risk Based Data Management System. The Risk Based Data Management System is a State governmental agency- based information…
Jul 19, 2012
We've got to do everything we can to stop New START in its tracks. President Obama, with the support of the Senate put the United States on a dangerous path of unilateral disarmament. New START forced the United States to reduce our…





