No, the issue was not as a result of the Clean Water Act being established to clean up the various rivers around the country. The issue had do with specifically the Potomac and the discharges that occurred within the Potomac. And those of us from the Western Caucus in 2001, which is when I first got to Congress, were trying to make the issue of the hypocrisy between the eastern constituency, the urban constituency of Washington, D.C., Virginia, and Maryland, trying to apply a different standard to Montana. So the issue was specific to the discharge in the Potomac, and it was specific to the Wilson Bridge and an endangered species, and the hypocrisy of two separate interpretations. The Supreme Court has made an interpretation that the agencies are going too far. We agree with it. The language in the bill agrees with it. This amendment is a bad amendment, and I hope you vote ``no.''
Denny Rehberg: “No, the issue was not as a result of the Clean Water Act being established to clean up the various rivers around the…”
Share
More from Denny Rehberg
First, we need to share our knowledge in regards to the ExxonMobil spill so that we can determine what can be done to prevent it from happening again.
Thank you, Mr. Issa, and I especially thank you, Dr. Paul. Tomorrow, the House of Representatives will uphold our constitutional duty and vote to pull back the secretive curtain of the Federal Reserve. The American people have a right to…
We don't need Federal bureaucrats telling us how to manage our land and wildlife.
My commonsense bill simply establishes the same requirement of congressional approval for new national monuments in Montana. With your support in this committee we can restore the Antiquities Act to its intended purpose. More importantly…





