I would support a prevalence requirement that meant something.
We can bring much-needed transparency to financial services by fully preserving the FTC's enormously important role in p...
Absolutely, Senator. And I'm a Republican, I should add. But, that was my view then, and it is my view now.
Might it be that, if we provided the FTC with more resources, this 7-year average proceedings could be shortened?
Been used one time.
Magnuson-Moss did not kill FTC rulemaking. A change in enforcement philosophy killed FTC rulemaking.
If we move forward and repeal, or substantially change, the Magnuson-Moss safeguards, what's it going to hurt?
You have the record--the letter in the record, but let me note some of those signatories here in order to exemplify the ...
We want to ensure the FTC has the capabilities and resources necessary to keep our consumers safe.
It's important to note that these are representatives of the very businesses we are relying on to create new jobs and pu...
So, actually, Magnuson-Moss was a mistake from the get-go.