I would argue that it's really Congress's role to decide when FTC needs that authority, delegate it appropriately, and then have FTC do its job.
I would support a prevalence requirement that meant something.
We can bring much-needed transparency to financial services by fully preserving the FTC's enormously important role in protecting consumers ...
Consumer advocates believe we need to liberate the FTC from statutory limitations that have shackled the Commission from aggressively and ef...
I know Senator Pryor's prior record in enforcement, and he would've done the rules a lot faster.
Thank you. Continuing with Chairman Muris, Commissioner Rosch said there were no Magnuson-Moss rules since 1978. Is that correct?
You have the record--the letter in the record, but let me note some of those signatories here in order to exemplify the breadth of the indus...
If we move forward and repeal, or substantially change, the Magnuson-Moss safeguards, what's it going to hurt?
Magnuson-Moss did not kill FTC rulemaking. A change in enforcement philosophy killed FTC rulemaking.
Been used one time.
my first choice is that the FTC be given all of the authority over consumer protection law enforcement