In closing, the legislation under consideration today is a product of bipartisan, bicameral negotiations. It has two parts: the core bill, which addresses the overall direction of Federal physical security and cybersecurity technology research and development efforts for protecting critical infrastructure; and the Clarke cybersecurity workforce amendment. The language in both parts went through regular order and was approved by the House. Therefore, I urge passage of H.R. 2952. Before I yield back, in case Ms. Clarke leaves, our committee has the unfortunate task next year of losing the chair and ranking member of this fine subcommittee, and I want to personally say that I really appreciate the manner in which they worked together on not just hearings but bringing forth good legislation to the full committee and, ultimately, this legislation we are dealing with today. So, I compliment both of them and we will miss them. I yield back the balance of my time.
Share
More from Bennie Thompson
I'm sure you are somewhat familiar with that article and the fact that we were left vulnerable with that situation.
This bill does not ban China from influencing our institutions of higher education. It just makes universities choose between relationships with Chinese universities and the Department of Homeland Security funding. This bill will not stop…
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. This is a 5-minute vote. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 249, nays 161, not voting 20, as follows: [Roll No. 408]…
It should go without saying that administration officials should not be using Signal for discussing intelligence matters reserved for the situation room — not to mention doing so incompetently by including members of the public.





