Some Members may be aware of specific situations regarding religious symbols located on public land in California. In fact, the committee report for H.R. 290 mentions one of these ongoing controversies. It is important to note that the committee report also makes clear ``this legislation does not specifically address the Mt. Soledad situation.'' Further, the report includes analysis of the legislation by the Congressional Budget Office, which found, ``under current law, religious symbols are not barred from being used in any military memorials; thus, H.R. 290 would codify current practice. According to the Department of Defense, the National Park Service, and the American Battle Monuments Commission, implementing H.R. 290 would not require any new memorials to be built or current memorials to be changed.'' H.R. 290 is not necessary and does not appear to change current law. As a result, we do not oppose it. At this time, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from Gregorio Sablan
The America COMPETES Act makes landmark investments to ensure our people, research, innovation, and manufacturing remain competitive globally. The legislation includes several of my bills supporting these goals: by providing Marianas…
My amendment No. 363, which is included in En Bloc 3, ensures the 1,700 small businesses in my district can access financing through the Small Business Administration's micro loan program. The program is targeted specially to help women…
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 6, line 13, insert ``(increased by $15,000,000)'' after the dollar amount. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant…
Republicans and Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee agree that now is the time to fix Medicaid funding in the insular areas. H.R. 2328, reported out of the committee in July, addresses the serious funding shortfall all the…





