That is the way I understand it, my friend, and our agreement at this point is for these appropriations bills, although in our rule last year we also extended that to authorizing bills. As you know, we don't want to continue that discussion, but the agreement we made this week, the majority leader is fully in compliance with the agreement we made so we can move forward with these appropriations bills with the understanding that while now we will have a significant opportunity to look at the remainder of the specific Member projects or earmarks in the bill, we also would have an opportunity to have a debatable point of order on the conference report if those appear. I would also like to ask about energy. I know in previous discussions on the floor at the end of previous weeks, I believe we discussed the likelihood that there would be an energy bill on the floor by July 4.
Roy Blunt: “That is the way I understand it, my friend, and our agreement at this point is for these appropriations bills, although…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing appropriations bills and the timeline for an energy bill during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Roy Blunt
I have been Chairman twice--let's see, I was Chairman, then Senator Shelby was Chairman, then I was Chairman again.
It has been great to work with you in this divided Congress as you become Chairwoman.
MCPP is thankful for the strong bipartisan support that the subcommittee leaders, Chairwoman Patty Murray and Ranking Member Roy Blunt, have shown in providing the NIH with its seventh consecutive funding increase during this time of…
in calculating, it may be possible that I have served on the Intel Committee longer than anybody besides Richard Burr currently on the committee, with some time in the House--but not all of the time in the House--and in the Senate. It is…





