To continue to handle it as we have, in a crisis moment, is not the right way to do it. To look at the long term, some tax relief is an option to look at the new obligations that the Federal Government has, in my view, to review our long-term sense of airline security. Until September 11, 2001, there was a widely held and generally defensible view that the fees that passengers paid for airline security were being paid for the purpose of protecting the passengers; and so it was a pure user fee, and it seemed to be defensible in that regard. We now know that we use our security system to secure people who not only are not on the plane that day but who may never be on the plane; and I think the gentleman senses that we need to review that structure to review the additional costs that airlines have assumed because of the new demands of airline security. To look for a more permanent solution to this is absolutely the direction we should take.
Roy Blunt: “To continue to handle it as we have, in a crisis moment, is not the right way to do it. To look at the long term, some…”
On the recordApril 3, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for long-term solutions to airline security and related costs.
Share
More from Roy Blunt
Dec 18, 2022
I have been Chairman twice--let's see, I was Chairman, then Senator Shelby was Chairman, then I was Chairman again.
Dec 14, 2022
a moment ago when I saw Senator Shelby and Senator Leahy shake hands warmly in the middle of the aisle, I thought of it as a century of service in the Congress. It is a century of learning lessons that fortunately they have both been able…
Dec 18, 2022
I know I am leaving the Committee in good hands as Senator Fischer moves into the position of Ranking Member at the beginning of the next Congress.
Dec 6, 2023
Please continue this commitment and provide timely investments public health and research programs at the CDC and in the NIH.





