I would say to my friend, we do have a disagreement on this and I think we do see what my good friend perceives as a minor change in procedure differently because I don't think it is that at all. I would say a couple of things: one is 18 times at least in the minority our friends on the other side used the same rule that my friend now so vigorously objects to because it would kill the bill. Eighteen times. They never were able to do it, but 18 times used it, many times with the provisions just like the one I cited earlier that were every bit as tangential as the one the gentleman is speaking to. Also I am sure in terms of, I don't know if the word was 'sincerity' or what, but I do know that our friend from Texas is a sincere and dedicated Member.
Roy Blunt: “I would say to my friend, we do have a disagreement on this and I think we do see what my good friend perceives as a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing procedural disagreements during a debate.
Share
More from Roy Blunt
in calculating, it may be possible that I have served on the Intel Committee longer than anybody besides Richard Burr currently on the committee, with some time in the House--but not all of the time in the House--and in the Senate. It is…
that whole concept of going where real people live is an important one. When people are facing higher utility bills every month and a bigger bill every time they fill up their gas tank, it doesn't take long for them to figure out that…
I am glad to get a chance to talk while Senator Manchin and Senator Collins, both good friends of mine who are here, and talk about some of the reasons for the hearing today.
The subcommittee is in recess until 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, May 7. Thank you all.





