In our Constitution, as the gentleman knows, the District was established differently than most capitals and, I am sure, has developed in a different way than was anticipated at the time. But when Presidential voting rights were extended to the District, the Constitution had to be amended to do that. Would the gentleman anticipate that this would also require a constitutional amendment since the District is not part of any State?
Discussing the constitutional implications of voting rights for the District of Columbia.
Share
More from Roy Blunt
I think that many of the things that this Committee has done, that you and Senator Klobuchar have done personally, and that Congress has done for the United States Capitol Police has sent a pretty strong message that people do care about…
Senator Blunt's longstanding promise of expanding the reach and resources of the Nation's Registry has saved thousands of lives.
Please continue this commitment and provide timely investments public health and research programs at the CDC and in the NIH.
MCPP is thankful for the strong bipartisan support that the subcommittee leaders, Chairwoman Patty Murray and Ranking Member Roy Blunt, have shown in providing the NIH with its seventh consecutive funding increase during this time of…
Other voices in this conversation
