I would say on the significant portions of those bills that we voted on in the last Congress and passed, virtually every Member of the majority then, the minority now, voted for 39 of the 41 9/11 provisions. We voted for increasing the minimum wage, though we thought with a more helpful balance, and we hope to continue to work for that balance so that the wage producer is not affected, the job creator, doesn't stop creating these important entry level jobs into the workforce. I would also say, on the PAYGO issue, I believe in the 9/11 bill and perhaps in the other bills, but in the 9/11 bill, I think the authorization was more often than not such sums as necessary. I don't know how that doesn't trigger some thought about cost in the future. I do know we were told it would be at least 3 weeks before we could get a score on what the bill would cost. So whether it violated a PAYGO provision or not, we are 2 weeks and 5 days from knowing the answer to that question. But I am expressing some of my concerns as we move forward.
Roy Blunt: “I would say on the significant portions of those bills that we voted on in the last Congress and passed, virtually every…”
On the recordJanuary 12, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing provisions of the 9/11 bill and concerns about budget implications during a floor speech.
Share
More from Roy Blunt
Dec 18, 2022
I know I am leaving the Committee in good hands as Senator Fischer moves into the position of Ranking Member at the beginning of the next Congress.
Dec 6, 2023
Please continue this commitment and provide timely investments public health and research programs at the CDC and in the NIH.
May 27, 2023
They decided to change the rules. I suspect that changes the Senate in fundamental ways forever.
Jul 20, 2022
that whole concept of going where real people live is an important one. When people are facing higher utility bills every month and a bigger bill every time they fill up their gas tank, it doesn't take long for them to figure out that…





