In that regard, has any conclusion been reached or not about whether tax increases similar to the ones that the House sent over to the Senate or other ways to pay for the ongoing expenses of the GI Bill that we all hope that we can arrive at a language on that we can be supportive of will be part of the package, or will the Senate view that there doesn't need to be a pay-for in this package be the prevailing view?
Discussing funding options for the GI Bill during Senate debate.
Share
More from Roy Blunt
Please continue this commitment and provide timely investments public health and research programs at the CDC and in the NIH.
They decided to change the rules. I suspect that changes the Senate in fundamental ways forever.
This is a unique Committee, and the opportunity to be so involved all the time...
MCPP is thankful for the strong bipartisan support that the subcommittee leaders, Chairwoman Patty Murray and Ranking Member Roy Blunt, have shown in providing the NIH with its seventh consecutive funding increase during this time of…
Other voices in this conversation
