I think it would be my obligation, even though I haven't actually moved to do so based on our discussions, to bring information and communicate information that is confidential and that I believe ought to be kept secret at this time. I will also remind my colleagues that many of them in September of 2006 voted to go into secret session, and we didn't go into secret session that day. I am pleased that we appear to be moving in that direction. But there is a time that the rules call for when you are in a situation where the national security of the country is important, and there is much of the information that reaches a secret level that could be discussed in a secret session that conclusions have been drawn from and can be drawn from, that my belief is we would benefit from that discussion.
Roy Blunt: “I think it would be my obligation, even though I haven't actually moved to do so based on our discussions, to bring…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a secret session regarding national security information.
Share
More from Roy Blunt
The subcommittee is in recess until 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, May 7. Thank you all.
a moment ago when I saw Senator Shelby and Senator Leahy shake hands warmly in the middle of the aisle, I thought of it as a century of service in the Congress. It is a century of learning lessons that fortunately they have both been able…
I am glad to join you and the other Senator from Georgia, Mr. Ossoff, here today and join both of you in sharing some thoughts about Senator Isakson. Senator Ossoff has already said a lot of things that are easily said. Not that they were…
This is a unique Committee, and the opportunity to be so involved all the time...





