nearly 25 years ago, President Ronald Reagan was given the option of signing what was at that time a little-known international treaty promising to bring the world's countries together to seamlessly and equitably manage the vast expanses of ocean covering the Earth. That accord, all 17 parts, 320 articles, and 9 annexes of it, was known the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. It was presented to the President as a key national security imperative, an important economic opportunity, and a powerful message of cooperation and trust to send to our current and future friends around the globe. Mr. Chairman, it didn't take President Reagan more than a few days to separate the rhetoric from the reality. He rightly interpreted the Law of the Sea Treaty, LOST, as a direct affront to American sovereignty and envisioned, presciently, as it turned out, that it might some day be used as a tool by foreign governments to exercise direct authority over American interests, activities, and industries. President Reagan not only refused to sign the treaty, he fired the staffers that were responsible for negotiating it in the first place. More than a generation later, there is talk in the U.S. Senate that they may dust off this stale treaty once again and bring it to a vote.
Roy Blunt: “nearly 25 years ago, President Ronald Reagan was given the option of signing what was at that time a little-known…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing President Reagan's rejection of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Share
More from Roy Blunt
Please continue this commitment and provide timely investments public health and research programs at the CDC and in the NIH.
...Indian Tribes are political, sovereign entities to which the Federal Government owes a trust responsibility.
I am glad to join you and the other Senator from Georgia, Mr. Ossoff, here today and join both of you in sharing some thoughts about Senator Isakson. Senator Ossoff has already said a lot of things that are easily said. Not that they were…
I won't be able to work with you and others on this in the next Congress. I am coming to the end of my 26 years here. In a couple more weeks, I will move on to whatever is the next chapter, and I am excited about that. But I am frustrated…





