it seems to me that today's debate on this bill is a chance for us to begin to talk about a compromise that will achieve a lot of the ends that our friends have on the other side of the aisle and a lot of the ends and goals that people on our side of the aisle have. Our discomfort with their version of the bill is not about the fact that they are trying to deal with the marriage penalty. I think the vast majority of Members believe that we need to do something to fix this problem of the marriage penalty. We think there is a way to do this that costs a good deal less than the bill that they are presenting today. We say that with all respect and humility. We think there is a way to work our way to a common conclusion that will really attack this problem of the marriage penalty and cost about half, maybe a little less than half of what their bill costs. We think that is important because at the end of this year, we are likely to be talking about a number of tax measures, some of which we have already voted on, others which we will vote on in the next weeks.
Richard Gephardt: “it seems to me that today's debate on this bill is a chance for us to begin to talk about a compromise that will achieve…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for compromise on a bill addressing the marriage penalty.
Share
More from Richard Gephardt
Congress today will vote on an issue of great importance to the Nation. This week, Congress will vote on the President's request for $86.7 billion in supplemental spending to fund ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, as…
To me, there is no room for the cynical politics of manufactured anger and false conviction.
The group behind these ads isn't backing down. One official saying the latest ad was intended to highlight national security experience and 'that is what it does.'
Who is he talking about? Is he saying labor unions or special interests or the senior citizens or the farmers? I don't think so. So I just -- I think these are not accurate comments. I don't understand them.





